Sunday, January 28, 2018

Vaccines can't be that bad, the news has nothing bad to say about them

Fairly regularly I post articles about how different vaccines cause autism, death, and injuries on a large scale and the response is almost predictable from those who rely on mainstream media sources alone. Even though who  admit that the mainstream news has been woefully inaccurate after predicting Hillary would win, and other recent high visibility failures will claim that  since a news sources is not part of mainstream media it must be inaccurate conspiracy theory no matter how many sources they site to validate thier claims.
A good example of this is the article I posted on my Facebook page today...
http://inshapetoday.com/now-official-fda-announced-vaccines-causing-autism/

To quote the bottom paragraph of the article..

"Just check out the CDC’s VAERS reports and the vaccine damage payouts by the HHS/HRSA. According to a new report published on March 1, 2017, by the department of health and human services of the United States, about $ 3,363,282,409.21 have been paid for vaccine adverse reactions and deaths from 1989 to 2017 so far."

Note that this is billions.

But what do you expect when you inject Mercury (aka themerisol) aluminum and heavy metals into kids. Tuna is considered unsafe to eat and water unsafe to drink if the Mercury levels are even a fraction of what is in a normal vaccine that contains themerisol. Somehow we are to believe Mercury is healthy to inject but not safe to consume in food or drink in much lower levels?

Legislation passed years ago removed the ability to directly sue the companies who produce vaccines

 ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Childhood_Vaccine_Injury_Act ) so now all suits are against the government and generally hushed up.

To make things worse the courts even ruled that the bad law was legal

 ( https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-vaccine-ruling-parents-cant-sue-drug-makers-for-kids-health-problems/ )

The info about how much damage these vaccins are doing is available online through the government website, but no hews media covers it because big pharma writes thier paycheck.

Over 1/5 of all advertising during the nightly news is for a drug....

To compound the problem VAERS where all vaccine related injury and death must now be reported does nothing to make the info easy to access but offers the data in a raw form with no easy to find totals to further hide the problems that are reported (https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html). To get reports on totals you either need to crunch the numbers yourself as no large media source is willing to risk loosing big pharma as a customer, or seek out news sources that don't take advertising dollars from big pharma of which there are very few.

What should be a strong hint that all is not well is when the same vaccines people here are refusing to take even at the risk of thier jobs or having thier kids taken from them are banned in multiple other 1st and 2nd world countries that are known for thier science (multiple Noble prizes for science, known for medical innovation, etc) like Israel, Sweden, Germany, and the like.

   The system in the United States is currently setup to protect vaccine makers from not only liability but any criticism, while at the same time laws are being passed to make it mandatory to take these same vaccines.

There are few other products on the market that can make the same claim although a few years ago they passed the Monsanto protection act (and now that Bayer is buying Monsanto it's all the same industry now).

    There are more statistics easily available to the general public on toaster deaths (https://www.liljegreninjurylawyers.com/what-are-the-most-dangerous-appliances-in-your-home/) than vaccines because toasters do not receive special protections against liabilities and no government is forcing people to buy toasters.

The lack of reporting of vaccine injuries and deaths is not due to it's low numbers, but due to legal protections placed on the industry by a government that would appear to be controlled or at least heavily influenced by big pharma money.

Here is a good question to ask "if the product is that good why would you need to force people to use it?" As more and more people refuse to vaccinate the amount of legislation forcing people to inject a product that is not subject to liability increases. The current media narrative is that anyone against a vaccine is just a wing nut and needs to be forced to take it.
What is more confusing is the common statement in the news that those who don't take the vaccine are somehow a danger to others who do......
Reread the previous sentence again .
Now contemplate if vaccines work how could someone who is vaccinated in any danger from someone who is not?
Next question would be why would any intelligent person make this statement unless they had something to gain by twisting the truth?
Anyway please don't take my word for any of this as blind belief in news media has got us into this mess. You have internet and the ability to look at library of Congress for the laws, cdc and other government agencies also must make data available due to the freedom of information act and other countries not under or big pharma protecting laws regularly ban drugs and vaccines their scientists found harmful that we continue to use and publish thier findings.
Ignorance in the age of information is a choice, please don't choose to be ignorant as the rest of us have to endure your decisions at the voting booth.....

No comments: